EKGF Community Voices
Enhancing Customer Experience Through Airbnb's Knowledge Graph
by Carlos Tubbax
In order to best support a company’s strategy, a foundation for execution is necessary. Such a foundation is the operating model of an organization. Ross, Weil, and Robertson (2006) define an operating model as; “the necessary level of business process integration and standardization for delivering goods and services to customers. An operating model describes how a company wants to thrive and grow. By providing a more stable and actionable view of the company than strategy, the operating model drives the design of the foundation for execution.”
Defining an operating model in an organization is very important because it enables the adoption of different strategic initiatives as a foundation for execution. Such an operating model represents and reinforces the strategy to be supported. Therefore, the operating model (or the lack of it) has a profound impact on how a company implements business processes and IT.
An operating model has two dimensions which are (1) business process standardization and (2) integration:
According to Ross, Weil, and Robertson (2006), standardization of business processes can be defined as; “defining exactly how a process will be executed regardless of who is performing the process or where it is completed. Process standardization delivers efficiency and predictability across the company”.
Standardization can lead to large increases in throughput and efficiency. However, it comes at a price. Since the higher business processes are standardized, the more difficult it is to tailor services and products for specific customer needs. This hampers innovation and business agility in the process.
Business process integration coordinates efforts and work across organizations through data. Sharing data can occur between processes to enable end-to-end transaction processing, or across processes to allow the company to present a single face to customers. Some of the benefits of integration are increased efficiency, coordination, transparency, and agility. However, integration entails a large amount of effort such as in end-to-end integration where companies need to develop standard data definitions and formats that will be shared and used across different business units and functions.
Companies adopt an operating model at the enterprise level but could also adopt different operating models at the division, business region, or other levels. In order to define an operating model at any of these different levels, companies need to answer the following two questions made by Ross, Weil, and Robertson (2006):
To what extent is the successful completion of one business unit’s transactions dependent on the availability, accuracy, and timeliness of other business unit’s data?
To what extent does the company benefit by having business units run their operations in the same way?
The first question determines integration requirements while the second one covers the standardization requirements of an organization. Depending on these requirements, there are four different possible operating models as depicted in Figure 1:
Each one of these operating model types is described below:
Diversification (low standardization, low integration)
Coordination (low standardization, high integration)
Replication (high standardization, low integration)
Unification (high standardization, high integration)
Diversification applies to companies that have different units with few common products, services, customers, or ways of doing business.
Central management exerts relatively little control over business units that operate in a highly autonomous way offering their own products and services to their own customers.
The Diversification model may offer synergies from related, but not integrated, business units. In this context, business units may create demand for one another or increase the company’s brand recognition which creates enterprise-wide value. Although there could be some synergies between business units, the success of companies with a Diversification model stem from the success of the individual business units and acquisitions of other related businesses.
Business units in a Coordination company usually share one of the following: customers, products, suppliers, or partners. Some of the benefits of the Coordination model are integrated customer service, cross-selling, and transparency across supply chain processes.
Whereas key business processes are tightly integrated, business units have unique processes and capabilities.
In these companies, low cost is not the main driver as the main driver is delivering the best service and products to the customer while executing business processes in the most efficient way possible. Strong central management defines and prioritizes cooperation.
Through integration without a high degree of standardization across business units or functions, growth can be achieved by offering already existing products or services to customer segments in new markets. Additionally, growth can also be achieved by improving services to meet new, but related, customer demands.
The Replication model provides autonomy to business units but runs operations in a highly standardized way. The business units are not tightly integrated as they are not dependent on each other’s transactions while they implement a set of highly standardized business processes that can be easily repeated in new business units. McDonald’s and other franchise companies are examples of a Replication company. The advantage of this model is that it enables organizations to build new business units from scratch with relatively little effort.
Companies that operate as a highly optimized whole around a highly standardized set of business processes, may benefit from the Unification model. Business units in these companies may have relatively very little autonomy and they best maximize efficiencies and customer services by using integrated data and driving variability out of business processes.
Unification companies typically have integrated supply chains with interdependencies between distributed business units. These business units share transaction data and standardized business processes. Therefore, these companies may benefit the most from enterprise-wide systems to support company standardization and integration requirements.
Management in these companies is highly centralized and plays an important role in driving out inefficiencies to foster growth through economies of scale by introducing new products. Since variability must be minimized in these companies, this model is best suited for companies that compete on price such as those that offer commodities where innovation or customization are not key.
Applying the operating model to attain growth
An operating model is the underlying logic of how an organization will enable and execute strategies. Each operating model entails its own opportunities for growth.
The need to tightly integrate business processes makes acquisitions and mergers more challenging as disparate data definitions need to be reconciled. However, the tight process integration of the Coordination and Unification models offers opportunities for organic growth through expansion into new markets or extensions of current product lines.
Process standardization, as in the Unification and Replication models, enables growth through a rip-and-replace approach to acquisitions. When an acquiring company wants to create a mirror image of itself out of an acquired company, it only needs to replace the processes and systems of the acquired business with its own. However, both models do not offer much leverage when a company chooses to expand into operationally distinct lines of business as both models depend on leveraging already existing processes.
The Diversification model imposes fewer constraints on the organic growth of individual business units and fewer limits for business acquisitions. However, it does not offer the benefits of integration and standardization across business units. The opportunities for growth of each operating model are shown in Figure 2:
Business units of a company can also adopt different operating models to respond to conflicting demands. For instance, Diversification companies may benefit from allowing their own business units to adopt their own operating models as these business units are highly independent. An example of a Diversification company whose business units adopted different operating models is Johnson & Johnson. J&J’s U.S. pharmaceutical group applies a coordination model in which there is a single touchpoint with healthcare practitioners while Janssen Pharmaceutica implements a Replication operating model in Europe with highly standardized, low-cost processes. This gives freedom to each business unit to implement a different operating model depending on its own objectives while maintaining a relatively simple operating model at a corporate level.
Contribution to the Enterprise
The operating model could help organizations define their requirements and expectations in terms of standardization, and integration across business units. This would be useful to harmonize business capabilities and glossaries across companies and their business units.
An operating model gives a company better guidance for developing IT and business process capabilities. It also serves as a stable foundation for strategic endeavours such as mergers and acquisitions. This foundation enables IT to be more proactive in identifying possible strategic opportunities. In order to define an operating model, management needs to define the role of business process standardization and integration. This also requires management to identify the company’s key business processes that create a sustainable competitive advantage for the company. As a result, an operating model offers a company the possibility to create and possess reusable capabilities for long-term growth. In this context, an operating model could be seen as the main driver of strategy at a corporate or business level. In addition, an operating model plays a major role in defining the required architecture, practices, management thinking, policies, and processes as they may be different for each operating model. In other words, an operating model could be a key driver in the design of separate organization units. Therefore, a proper translation from an operating model to a data model might be critical for digital transformation.
Furthermore, an operating model may serve as input to the development of an Enterprise Architecture that serves as the organizing logic for business processes and IT infrastructure based on the company’s standardization and integration requirements.
Contribution to the EKG
Since an operating model reflects the business needs for standardization across a company and its business units, it could be a great input for the development of reusable business vocabularies as part of the data infrastructure of a company as later explained in the data part of this work. [C2] These vocabularies may, in turn, be converted to machine-readable models. Such machine-readable models are called ontologies.